“Do you know who killed my baby?”
That anguished question was wrested from the anguished soul
of Carol Dodge as she spoke with a young girl named Destiny Osborne shortly
after Carol’s 18-year-old daughter Angie was murdered in Idaho Falls in June,
1996.
With the police unable to identify any viable suspects,
Carol – driven by an irrepressible maternal impulse to find and punish the
person who had killed her daughter – pursued her own investigation. Over the
past twenty years she has accumulated a library of evidence, most of which has
been ignored by the police and the Bonneville County Prosecutor’s Office.
It is because of Carol’s indefatigable efforts that we know
that Christopher
Tapp, the man who was convicted of that murder in May, 1998, didn’t commit that
crime.
Carol’s inquiry was only a few weeks old when one of her contacts
arranged a meeting with Osborne. The high school-age girl, who was addicted to
methamphetamine, had become acquainted with Tapp, a 20-year-old dropout who
also had a drug problem. Osborne
would later testify in court that she had attended a party where Tapp –
along with two friends named Ben Hobbs and Jeremy Sargis – spoke openly about
raping and killing Angie. At one point Tapp supposedly said, referring to
Angie, “The bitch got blood all over my shirt.”
If Tapp had murdered Angie at such intimate range that his
shirt was covered in the victim’s blood, his DNA would have been found on the
clothes of the victim, and most likely under her fingernails. Tapp provided a
DNA sample to the police, but the IFPD didn’t display any particular urgency in
examining the physical evidence.
“They put Chris Tapp’s DNA sample in a refrigerator,” Carol
told me. Following
the arrest of Tapp’s friend Ben Hobbs on rape charges in Ely, Nevada, the
IFPD brought in both Tapp and another friend named Jeremy Sargis in the hope of
getting one or both of them to implicate Hobbs as the murderer.
“The police took Chris and Jeremy in separate rooms and
interrogated them, and tried to play them off against each other,” Carol
recalled. Sargis’s parents were people of means, and they arranged for their
son to have adequate legal representation.
Tapp’s family was in more straitened circumstances
financially. Tragically, Chris was also more psychologically vulnerable than
his friend: During one interrogation, Sargis had the presence of mind not only
to tell IFPD investigator Jared Fuhriman that he had nothing to do with the
murder, but to ridicule his interrogation methods. This had the delightful
effect of triggering a meltdown on Fuhriman’s part, which was captured on video (starting at about 35:29).
Fuhriman found Tapp to be more pliant than Sargis. After
all, the officer had been grooming his potential victim for years: He was a
school resource officer at Eagle Rock Junior High School when he met Tapp, and
during Tapp’s abbreviated time at Skyline High School Fuhriman was his DARE
instructor.
One measure of the effectiveness of that program is found in
the fact that Tapp graduated from DARE – and wound up with a drug conviction
that took him into a rehab program that he finished shortly after Angie Dodge
was murdered. This was not an unusual outcome for DARE indoctrination. Former Idaho DARE
Coordinator Larry McGhee saw his oldest
daughter Tracy become a heroin addict, even as he was tutoring other peoples’
children about the dangers of drugs.
Jared Fuhriman, who went on to become Mayor of Idaho Falls,
had a similar failure on the home front: About ten years ago, his
then-19-year-old son Peyton was arrested in possession of marijuana
paraphernalia he had found among his
father’s effects. The mayor insisted that his collection of drug accessories
was left over from his time as a DARE tutor.
The mayor’s son was spared the full impact of the carceral
state: His
charge was negotiated down to a trivial misdemeanor, and he was given 18
months of probation with 90 days of “discretionary”
jail time (only to be imposed in the event of a subsequent arrest).
Educating children about the harmful effects of narcotics addiction
is a worthy undertaking that is entirely peripheral to the purpose of DARE,
which is to subvert parental authority, while cultivating in
schoolchildren an unhealthy reverence for the State and its
representatives.
It also allows uniformed predators like Jared Fuhriman to start grooming future
victims.
“Christopher would just keep saying, `Fuhriman is my friend,
mom – he wouldn’t put my life in jeopardy, he wouldn’t lead me astray,” Vera
Tapp told Pro Libertate. “He was just such a `good old boy’ with
Christopher…. You can see it in the videos – `Oh, Christopher, we’re friends,
we’re buddies,’ you know, laughing and joking around. And that’s just what he
did when [Tapp]was in junior high. He [was] learning people’s trust and how to
manipulate people. And that’s what he did – he manipulated Christopher.”
By early January 1997, Fuhriman and his superior, Detective
Ken Brown, were aware that Tapp, along with his friends Hobbs and Sargis, had
been eliminated as suspects by the DNA evidence. Hobbs was in custody in Ely,
Nevada. Sargis had obtained legal representation and was thus protected from
Fuhriman’s predatory intentions. Tapp was the one left without a chair when the
music stopped.
The police didn’t have the competence to solve the murder;
their skill-set was better suited to bullying a naïve and insecure young man
into a false confession.
Following a particularly harrowing mind-rape session on
January 16, 1997, Tapp arrived at his home “white as a sheet” and trembling.
“I said, `Christopher, this is a murder case; you don’t go
down there without a lawyer,” Vera Tapp
related to me. Still under the influence of his school-administered
programming, Tapp remained convinced of Fuhriman’s benign intentions.
“He kept saying, `I know Mr. Fuhriman’ … and he was secure
with him, because he’d known him since junior high,” Vera continued. “And he
said, `We’re friends, mom.’”
Understandably frantic over what the police were doing to
her son, Vera adamantly insisted that Tapp refrain from speaking with them
again without a lawyer in the room.
The following morning, a Saturday, Fuhriman knocked on the
door and demanded to know why Christopher hadn’t gone to the police station.
“He gave me his word,” the predator complained, cultivated
insincerity suppurating from every syllable. Vera explained that under no
circumstances would Chris be speaking to them again without a lawyer at his
side.
An hour later, Chief Kent Livesey pounded on Vera’s door to
demand that Chris accompany him to the station.
Vera told that things weren’t “going the way they were
supposed to go, so we’re going to get a lawyer and we’ll see you Monday
morning.”
“But Christopher gave me his word!” Livesey protested, as if
the young man were morally required to surrender his rights. He also told Vera
that “Christopher is up to his eyeballs in this” – which the Chief almost
certainly knew was untrue. Unintimidated, Vera reiterated that her son would
fulfill his promise to cooperate in the investigation – but only with a lawyer
present.
Within a matter of hours, Chris was arrested on what the
police knew was a spurious charge of “harboring a felon.” He has been in a cage
ever since. A little more than a year later, Chris was found guilty of murder
on the basis of his own spurious confession, supplemented by perjured testimony
by Fuhriman and Destiny Osborne.
No responsible official in Bonneville County still believes
that Tapp’s confession was valid. A
report commissioned by the Bonneville County Prosecutor’s Office has conceded
as much.
During
the September 20 hearing on Tapp’s most recent appeal, Deputy Prosecutor
John Dewey contended that the defense had been unacceptably tardy in raising
issues related to evidence that had been deliberately withheld from the
defendant by his predecessors nearly twenty years ago. The
most important omissions were excerpts of videotaped polygraph examinations of
Tapp by Detective Steven Finn in which the officer threatens the victim with
the death penalty, then manipulates him into a confession that doesn’t comport
with the physical evidence.
According to Dewey, the tapes were probably “in a defense
file somewhere, in the original defense file.” In support of that claim he
offered several affidavits from IFPD officers solemnly attesting that it the
department carefully logged and tracked critical evidence.
Presumably, this would include the confiscated drug
paraphernalia that somehow wound up in a box in Jared Fuhriman’s home, and some
of which was later found in the possession of his 19-year-old son.
By way of a riposte to Dewey’s claim, Tapp’s appellate
attorney, John Thomas, offered “two words: Kimball Mason.”
At about the same time Peyton Fuhriman was playing with
evidence that was improperly stored among his father’s effects, Mason, the
former Idaho Falls city prosecutor, was
being prosecuted for stealing
30 guns from the IFPD’s evidence room. Two of them materialized in the
hands of
former IFPD Officer Todd Ericsson, who had been a supervisor
of detectives at the department prior to his retirement in 2003. He has since
gone on to be a contractor for the State Department and Pentagon in the Middle
East, Africa, Central Asia, and the Balkans, helping to cultivate the next
generation of future foreign adversaries.
The grotesque incompetence of the IFPD regarding the
security of its evidence room prompted Chief Livesey to request an
outside audit by Dan Bullock, a retired San Jose Police Chief. Contrary to
the solemn assertions in the affidavits filed this week in the Chris Tapp case,
Bullock found that Property
Office Manager Zuella Nelson was not certified for her position, that the
department did not have a complete manual on evidence handling, and was lackadaisical
in conducting internal reviews and audits.
If the prosecution had turned over the critical video
records to Chris Tapp’s defense team in 1998, this would be a matter of record
in the court’s evidence registry. It isn’t. The argument offered by Deputy
Prosecutor Dewey and the IFPD is self-nullifying. In essence, they are saying: “Why
should we be held responsible for
sloppy record-keeping? If the defense can’t prove we didn’t turn over the
critical videotapes, that’s on them.”
The only reason those critical recordings were discovered
was the tenacity of
Carol Dodge, who forced herself to sit through the interrogations of the
man she had once believed to be responsible for murdering her baby. After
immersing herself in this relentlessly unpleasant task, she
realized that Tapp had been coerced and manipulated into a false confession
– and reached out to the Innocence Project, Judges
for Justice, and the media to share what she had found.
From the beginning, the IFPD has treated Carol with disdain
and hostility.
“They initially focused on our immediate family as suspects
in the murder,” Carol told Pro Libertate. “Every time I talked to the police,
the lead detective would tell me, `Carol, you better brace yourself, because
when the DNA results come back it’s going to be very bad.’”
Angie’s relatives were quickly disqualified by the tests,
which left the police with no suspects – or, at least, without any they were
willing to pursue. Hobbs went on to serve a prison term in Nevada for raping a
woman at knife-point – but he had nothing to do with Angie’s murder. So the
IFPD weaponized the confidence Fuhriman had cultivated in Chris Tapp and “closed”
the case by framing an innocent man.
As mothers who have lost children to acts of violence – rape
and murder in one case, mind-rape, kidnapping, and decades of unjust incarceration in another -- Carol
Dodge and Vera have become friends.
“She’s lost her daughter, and they won’t do [anything] about
it,” Vera
told me, referring to Carol and the contemptuous disregard to her displayed
by the IFPD and Bonneville County Prosecutor’s Office. “And they should bend
over backwards for this lady because she’s done all the work for them. She’s
beat the bushes.”
No glory accrues to the State or its agents when an innocent
man is acquitted of a crime, or when an unjustly convicted man is set free.
Everybody involved in the wrongful conviction of Chris Tapp knows he is
innocent, and that they have committed a horrible – and ongoing – crime against
the rule of law and human decency.
At present, the only way some semblance of justice can occur
would be for Judge Stephens to decide that truth, honor, and the rights of a
deeply wronged individual are worthier than the prestige of the State and the
reputation of its servants. Given the pervasive and formidably entrenched
corruption that prevails in Bonneville County, that outcome is profoundly
unlikely.
Dum spiro, pugno!
Dum spiro, pugno!
This story keeps growing and is branching out as if the branches are attached to the tree trunk of evil.
ReplyDeleteThe way this is starting to look to me is, Smith was a CI who was setting up people and forfeitures must have been bringing in a lot of money that goes under the radar. Say nothing of drugs and other things that found their way back on the streets. Being murder has no statue of limitations, the dirty players could not have the murders remain open and needed to close the cases no matter what. They, the dirty players did not want to take any chances of a cop in years to come open up these cases. To sleep well at night and on their taxpayer paid retirement, the books needed to be closed. That's the way this matter is coming to light to me. If I have this creect in my view which is only my opinion from reading these fact finding stories that Will has been doing that all seem to connect. Nothing will be done and justice will ever come to light, not in Idaho and never in east Idaho.