Friday, August 5, 2016

Mundane Lives Don't Matter, So Don't Try to Exercise Your Rights (UPDATED October 4)

See update below.

In every encounter between a police officer and a citizen, only one life matters to the former – and it isn’t the latter. 

“Follow the commands of a police officer or risk dying,” snarled Major Travis Yates of the Tulsa Police Department in a recent essay for Law Officer. Requiring police officers to respect the rights of the citizens they detain, or to practice de-escalation when citizens assert their rights, would be tantamount to asking that “police stop being police” – that is, commissioned ministers of violence acting on behalf of the divine State.

Whenever a police officer inflicts himself on a citizen, every consideration is made for officer safety, despite the fact that the citizen is the one facing an immediate, known risk of lethal violence. A Mundane who acts upon specific police instruction to take minimal precautions for his own safety runs the additional risk of a ruinous and unjustified arrest – or a life-threatening assault by one of his privileged overseers in a state-issued costume. 

Claire and Daniel McIsaac (l. to r.)
Idaho Falls resident Daniel McIsaac was stopped for speeding shortly after midnight on April 16 on an isolated stretch of Highway 26, near milepost 177 and Marley Road. This is a section of south-central Idaho where several recent confrontations have occurred between motorists and police impersonators. 

Unfortunately for McIsaac and his wife Claire, the armed stranger who detained them was Lincoln County Sheriff’s Deputy Scott Denning. A police impersonator is immeasurably less dangerous than someone claiming to be invested with the mystical property called “authority” that supposedly allows him to use aggressive violence against someone who doesn’t submit to him. 

The encounter began badly, with Denning flinging four commands into McIssac’s face before identifying himself as an officer, or showing any credentials. No, a uniform and chintzy piece of costume jewelry didn’t qualify, and neither did the running lights on Denning’s vehicle. “Authentic” insignia don’t legitimately confer special rights or privileges on those who carry them, of course. However, it is useful for the victim of a roadside detention to know if the person who has stopped him can summon others in the event the victim decides to end the encounter on his own terms. 

Denning demanded that McIsaac extinguish his cigarette, and they briefly argued as to whether the deputy’s “authority” extends to that detail. If the deputy were actually a servant, rather than someone claiming to exercise proprietary control over a citizen, he wouldn’t enjoy the privilege of telling the citizen to extinguish a cigarette while sitting in his own vehicle. Patrol officers are taught to pretend that they smell marijuana or alcohol during a traffic stop, and the demand that a driver snuff his cigarette is often a prelude to reciting that pretext for a vehicle search. (As the late Sandra Bland learned, that demand can also be an overture to an unlawful arrest that can have fatal consequences.)
Doing as he was told: Daniel calls 911.
After Denning demanded that McIsaac exit the vehicle with his papers at the ready, the driver quite sensibly asked the deputy to provide him with his precinct number.

“For what?” Denning impatiently snapped. 

“I’m going to call them report this,” McIsaac explained

“You go right ahead,” the deputy dismissively replied.

At this point in the conversation, Deputy Denning explicitly instructed McIsaac to confirm that he was dealing with a law enforcement officer, rather than an impersonator. From that point forward, McIsaac was complying with an officer’s instructions, and doing so with commendable composure in the face of Denning’s entirely needless escalation.

As McIsaac attempted to call the LCSO, Denning called for backup, and then growled: “Sir, comply with what I’m telling you or I’m going to arrest you.” 

“There’s nobody else on the road – this is dangerous!” McIsaac correctly observed.

“No, it’s not,” Denning replied – meaning, of course, it wasn’t dangerous to the only person who mattered to him in the encounter. 

“There’s nobody else on the road,” the driver pointed out. “How do I know you’re a cop? Show me your identification.”

“I don’t have to show you my identification,” Denning lied. “You can see I’m in full uniform and a marked unit” – a claim that has been made, within recent months, by police impersonators in that same section of Idaho

“I’m calling 911 right now,” McIssac informed Denning. 

“OK,” the deputy responded – for the second time explicitly authorizing McIsaac to take minimal precautions for his own safety. 

McIsaac dialed 911 and requested another unit “because, you know, it can be very dangerous, with people impersonating cops, and stuff,” he told the operator. “He’s getting very, very aggressive…. I want to wait for another officer, because I am very uncomfortable.”

“Dispatch – have ‘em step it up,” Denning grunted into his lapel radio, which as it happens was the same course of action McIsaac was pursuing. 

After finishing his 911 call, McIsaac emerged from the vehicle, and was arrested for “obstructing and delaying an officer.” The entire encounter had lasted five minutes and thirty-three seconds. 

“Just so you know,” McIssac said after being cuffed and stuffed, “I wasn’t really trying to be rude. I hear lots of stories of people getting pulled over – you’ve probably heard those, too – I was told to call and make sure it’ safe….”

“You’re obstructing my duties,” his kidnapper insisted.

Actually, McIsaac was seeking to assure his own safety, and that of his wife, which he has every right to do. Exercising that right, however, is an act falling within the ever-expanding definition of the un-legislated, but sternly punished, offense called “contempt of cop.”

“I’ve been told in the past that if you’re pulled over on a deserted highway, to double-check,” McIsaac patiently elaborated.

“So – do you know many people who are out running around in full uniform in fully-marked patrol units that are impersonating police officers?” Denning sneer-gloated. 

The answer to that question, the deputy most likely knew, was “yes.”
Verify, then comply: ISP Lt. Weadick.
Within very recent memory, there have been at least three incidents in which drivers in south-central Idaho have been stopped and harassed by an armed police impersonator (a fact that has been pointed out by Meridian police accountability activist Matthew Townsend.) Those incidents all took place within easy driving distance of the dark, isolated stretch of Highway 26 where McIsaac was waylaid by a state-licensed highway predator. One of the incidents involved  a physical assault by the impersonator, who may not have had government-issued credentials but certainly behaved as if he were an authentic cop. There have been similar incidents elsewhere in the state. 

Police agencies across the country have consistently told the public that if there is any doubt as to the identity of the person conducting a traffic stop, drivers should proceed to a populated, well-lit stretch of road, or at least call 911 to verify that the highwayman has been given an official license to harass his betters.

If the driver is concerned about the identity of the armed stranger, especially if “the person won’t identify themselves [sic] … call 911,” Idaho State Police Lt. Chris Weadick told television viewers in Idaho Falls on January 16, 2015. “Talk to a dispatcher and try to get to the bottom of who’s out there talking to you.”

Precisely the same advice was given by the Idaho Falls Police Department, with specific reference to police impersonator incidents in the very section of south-central Idaho where McIsaac had his infuriating encounter with the officious Deputy Denning.

In the event a driver is unsure about the identity of the person who has stopped him, “roll up your window, lock your door and call 911 and verify the person is a police officer,” counseled the IFPD. “If you feel your life is in danger, drive away – still maintain the speed limit and obey the rules of the road – to a well-lit, public area and call 911.”

Both the ISP and IFPD clearly encouraged drivers in McIsaac’s position not to comply until they were satisfied that it was safe to do so. Denning himself twice instructed McIsaac to act on that advice—and then arrested him for doing what he had been repeatedly been told, by police, was the appropriate thing. 

McIsaac, who, once again resides in Idaho Falls, has a Master’s Degree and is employed as a counselor at a local rehabilitation facility. He was polite in the exercise of his rights as they had been explained to him by three entities or individuals speaking on behalf of the government. His arrest was thus an act of entrapment by estoppel – a due process violation that occurs when a citizen is charged with a crime for conduct that he had been assured was legal and proper.
Denning on the range.
By arresting McIsaac for exercising his rights, Denning – who is under investigation by the Idaho POST Council for unspecified charges – committed what the Idaho State Code (18-703) defines as an “illegal arrest or seizure.” He conveyed him to the Lincoln County Jail in nearby Shoshone, which was already full, and then to the Jerome County lockup.

Because he had no legal right to incarcerate McIsaac for any length of time, Denning compounded the false arrest with the offense of false imprisonment – defined by the state code (18-2901) as “the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another.” If he weren’t protected by qualified immunity, Denning would be liable to a one-year prison term and a $5,000 fine.

Although McIsaac has been found guilty of nothing, he and his family have already been punished because he behaved precisely as the police had instructed him. If he is convicted of the "crime" of following well-established citizen safety protocols, McIsaac could be sent to jail for a year.

“I was able, by some miracle, to get $610 from an ATM at 3:30 in the morning to pay Dan’s bail,” his wife Claire told Pro Libertate. The couple has made four 300-mile round trips from Idaho Falls to Shoshone to attend three pre-trial hearings and an abortive trial on July 25.
The trial was postponed during voir dire when it became clear that few, if any, of the potential jurors understood the concept of presumption of innocence. Owing to the stupid intransigence of the prosecutor’s office in pursuing a manifestly invalid criminal case, the McIsaacs will be compelled to make at least one more round-trip: Their trial was originally rescheduled for August 15, and then capriciously pushed back again to October 4.

Claire estimates that the family has already been forced to sink more than a thousand dollars into this legal struggle, which – although she was far too polite to say as much – was inflicted on them because a pathologically self-preoccupied deputy took offense that a Mundane tried to act in the interests of his safety, and that of his wife. After all, in such encounters, only “Blue Lives” really matter. 

                                                    UPDATE, October 4:

A Lincoln County jury acquitted Daniel McIssac after very brief deliberation. Deputy Denning's gratuitous effort to punish a Mundane for the exercise of his rights ended without a fine, additional jail time, or probation -- but it did cost an innocent family more than a thousand dollars and several days that could have been devoted to more productive pursuits.

After getting his tax-fattened ass handed to him in court, the butt-hurt costumed bully tried to salve his ego by inflicting one last increment of misery on his betters.

"We just left the courthouse, and [Denning] followed us," Claire informed me shortly after the trial concluded. "He followed us down the road. He appeared out of nowhere and followed us."

Scotty, if you read this -- and I know you will -- get over it. Man up and deal with the fact that you had every conceivable advantage and got your arrogant, privileged ass kicked. Fairly soon, I suspect, POST will revoke your privileges and compel you either to find honest work -- which would be a novelty in your case -- or take the Gypsy Cop ratline to another jurisdiction. In either case, just choke down your bitter defeat and go the hell away.

Beware, Adams County; a privileged "sociopath" is about to return to patrol duty -- this week's Freedom Zealot Podcast:

Dum spiro, pugno!


tz said...

Note that CSPOA.ORG has now adopted a motto, policy, or whatever or "COMPLY or DIE!" Forget the Castle Doctrine that goes back to the Magna Charta

Michael said...


I've seen the same kind of thing here in Utah: Police officers telling people to drive to the "nearest lighted area" or to an "more populated area" to verify the identity of the person pulling them over.

Every time I've heard this, I've turned to my wife and said, "That's absolute bulls**t. There's no way a cop will wait for you to drive 1, 2, 5 or any number of miles so that you'll feel safe. You're more likely to end up arrested or, worse, shot dead from trying to pull this stunt."

Unfortunately, I have heard others who have spouted the same kind of baloney back to me. This careful regurgitation really irritates me.

I appreciate your efforts to demonstrate the near constant hypocrisy of those who are clothed in the robes of the state's priesthood.

frenchy said...

“roll up your window, lock your door and call 911 and verify the person is a police officer,”

--who will then either grab your window and break it, or smash out your window and seize you.

“If you feel your life is in danger, drive away – still maintain the speed limit and obey the rules of the road – to a well-lit, public area and call 911.”

--at which point the officer will position himself to be brushed by your departing vehicle, or claim as much, and then empty his Glock 19 into your vehicle as you drive away.

Seriously, what idiots does this guy think he's addressing? It's not "Comply, or die". It's "Comply, and still die!"

Anonymous said...

Watch and see, the warning of, going to a well lighted and public area, will be what woman should do, not men. Never mind his wife was in the car with him. Now, it's deal or railroad time to keep a civil lawsuit out of the courtroom. A change of venue would be the smart thing to do at this point. The system knows the citizen has been wronged but so what. This is yet another case in point that shows the contemptuous demeanor people in government have for citizens. The 3 largest lies now days are: 1, government is there to serve the people or we are from the government and we are here to help you. 2, traffic tickets are all about public safety. 3, a person can get their fair day in court. Explaining that because many don't understand. A courtroom is a closed Union shop, the lawyers are all union members of the BAR. And lawyers have not allowed a "true bill" in any inditements in any courtroom for over a hundred years.

Kent McManigal said...

Cops are scum, and are members of a dangerous, evil gang.

Anonymous said...

Papers please comrade.
Don't forget to vote this November peasant.
Forward! The Great Leap Forward.

Aaron Swenson said...

This is one of MANY situations that make me not feel the least bit bad when a cop is shot dead. I hope it happens more and more until no one WANTS to be cops anymore.

Doc Ellis 124 said...

Even Then

we die
even when
we comply lethally then

Greetings Will


Thank you for writing this essay

Lyin' Doc 124