|He wouldn't back down: Brian J. McNelis, left, with his companion, Leslie White. |
Brian McNelis was still recovering from a police raid that wrecked his home and threatened to destroy his commercial painting business when he learned that the state intended to separate him from his daughter.
On January 6, 2010, a counter-narcotics task force headed by the Ada County Sheriff's Office invaded McNelis's home in Boise, brandishing a warrant claiming that Detective Stephen Craig had discovered “marijuana trimmings” during an early-morning “trash pull” earlier that day.
McNelis and his companion Leslie White were arrested on drug-related charges. Two days later, as Brian prepared for an “emergency shelter care” hearing for his teenaged daughter Dory (whose name has been changed for the purpose of this article), he was confronted by a deputy, identified in court documents as “Officer Rodante,”who demanded that he surrender custody of the girl.
“I was told that if I proceeded with the hearing, and tried to assert my parental rights, I would be arrested on the spot on felony charges of child endangerment and injury to a child,” McNelis told me. “I didn't have any real choice in the matter. If I had tried to protect my daughter, I would have been taken away in handcuffs, and she would have been seized by the state anyway.”
Brian hasn't seen Dory since that day. Interviewed by a social worker a few days later, she was furious over being separated from her father and angrily defended him against the allegations, according to Brian. As the years accumulated, however, she came to believe what she was being told by the officials who had abducted her – and who, after all, controlled the information she received about her father.
“She is a brilliant, talented young woman who was the center of my existence,” Brian sadly recalled. “Like other people close to me, she now believes that I'm a drug dealer.”
|Ada County Mundanes admire their overlords' lethal toy.|
The abuse inflicted upon McNelis is infuriatingly commonplace in post-constitutional America. The legal vindication he won last May 15 following a five-year legal ordeal was very much out of the ordinary. Following a four-day federal civil trial in which McNelis represented himself, a jury ruled that Detective Craig had perjured himself in order to obtain the warrant that led to the January 6, 2010 raid on McNelis's home.
In his affidavit requesting a search warrant, Deputy Craig reported an anonymous tip from someone identified only as “Damien” who said that there were “a half-dozen” marijuana plants growing outside McNelis's home. In December 29, 2009, Craig reportedly conducted a “trash pull” outside the residence that yielded no evidence of a crime. A second “pull” allegedly carried out after midnight on the morning of January 6 supposedly yielded “clippings of suspected marijuana plants” that “produced a presumptive positive for marijuana” in a field test. He also to have “located mail bearing the name Brian McNelis with the address of 2830 Cloverdale, Boise, Idaho” in the same container.
“How much stuff was there?” Craig was subsequently asked by ACSO internal affairs investigator John Lewis.
“I really don't know,” Craig replied.
“Did you take any pictures of any of this stuff?” Lewis inquired.
“No, I did not,” Craig admitted.
“You didn't send it to the ISP [Idaho State Police] forensic lab, correct?” persisted Lewis.
“That's correct,” Craig responded, explaining that “I felt that there was no need to. It was a small quantity, field test was positive.” For the same reason, Craig continued, he didn't bother to tell his patrol supervisor about his discovery at the time.
Not only did Craig not bother to document his alleged discovery, the “evidence” he supposedly used to confirm that the trash through which he had rummaged had actually belonged to McNelis – an unremarkable white envelope bearing the suspect's name – was unpersuasive.
“I don't know if it was junk mail or a bill,” Craig explained to the internal affairs officer. “I didn't look at it.”
Implausibilities, misrepresentations, and errors abounded in Craig's affidavit. In describing the trash pull, Craig incorrectly listed BFI as the trash removal company, rather than Allied Waste, and listed the wrong day for garbage removal.
Despite his claims to have conducted an investigation that lasted nearly half a year, Craig could not accurately describe McNelis's home. He gave the wrong street as McNelis's address. He described the house as having “white vertical siding and white trim,” when it was actually brown, referred to one outbuilding when there were two on the property, and referred to multiple “windows” in the garage when only one existed. McNelis misreported the time of the second trash pull, offering a chronology that would have had him working a 20-hour shift.
Most seriously, Craig falsely claimed to have submitted evidence from the trash pull to the Ada County Sheriff's Office property room on December 30. It wasn't until nearly a month later – January 20, two weeks after the raid on McNelis's home – that Craig and his Deputy Jose Del Rio, his comrade in the ACSO's “ACTION" (Anti-Crime Team In Our Neighborhood) unit placed evidence of any kind in the property room.
In sworn testimony at the probable cause hearing, Craig insisted that the supposed clippings had been “stored in the property room” by the time of the raid, and that “I did not transfer property” following service of the warrant. However, Craig later insisted that the original marijuana evidence had been kept in a safe in the ACTION unit's office – which would mean, in any case, that the chain of custody had been broken.
During the January 6 search of McNelis's home, Craig claimed to have seized “grow lights” and a substantial quantity of processed marijuana. None of that evidence was properly accounted for or ever produced. Three invoices from the ACSO's property room all have handwritten alterations to back-date receipt of the evidence.
|Yes, Craig is a liar: Judge Hansen.|
Roughly a year after the raid on McNelis's home, Judge Timothy Hansen of Idaho's Fourth Circuit Court ruled that the search warrant was invalid.
In a Memorandum and Order issued on April 15, 2011, Judge Hansen found that Deputy Craig had “knowingly, intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth” incorporated false statements into his affidavit. Judge Hansen reiterated that finding on August 8 in response to a plaintive motion to reconsider filed by the Ada County Prosecutor's office.
If Craig's affidavit had been truthful, his behavior would have been “legal” – and utterly mortifying: Following an anonymous tip, he would have kept a home under surveillance for months, picking through garbage in pursuit of a handful of dried vegetable matter that would have “justified” a raid, criminal charges, and the disruption of a loving family. Judge Hansen's ruling certified that that Deputy Stephen Craig, in addition to being suitable for service in the Stasi, is a liar.
Judge Hansen's ruling led to the interview with ACSO internal affairs investigator John Lewis, whose highest priority was to save the deceitful deputy's career, rather than to protect the public or provide redress to Brain McNelis.
As in all exercises of this kind, the officer was informed of his “Garrity” privileges – under which his disclosures could be used only for disciplinary purposes, rather than to build a criminal case. When a mere commoner is interrogated by a police officer, the investigator will often seek to prompt the subject into making damaging admissions, or even confessing to an offense he didn't commit. Lewis used similar tactics in an effort to elicit self-serving answers from Craig that would help his superiors exonerate him.
“Sir, I'm not here to hang you out to dry,” Lewis assured Craig. “I'm just trying to get the facts and try to make sure that your career is not going to end up in the shambles.... [T]he more than I can come up with and show the prosecutor's office, the better they're going to be able to go back to the judge and say, `This guy didn't lie. He just made some administrative errors in the thing.'”
Not surprisingly, Lewis found that Craig had committed “errors” and omissions, but declined to rule that the detective had submitted a false report. Shortly thereafter, Craig's boss, former Ada County Sheriff Gary Raney, notified the deputy that he would be suspended “without pay for one day or the equivalent of eight (8) hours” on the following September 30 as punishment for “administrative violations.”
Rather than manning up and accepting that trivial and inadequate punishment, Craig decided to quit.
“This letter is to notify you of my decision to tender my resignation as an Ada County Detective in order to pursue other employment opportunities,” Craig informed Sheriff Raney in a letter dated September 26, 2011.
This allowed Craig to use his accumulated vacation and “compensatory” time to secure a job with another law enforcement agency – Idaho's Canyon County Sheriff's Office, where he remains employed today. Just as importantly, by ducking the suspension Craig may have obscured the fact that he is a repeat offender: While employed as a police officer in Howard County, Maryland in 2000, Craig was suspended for an unlawful search by “popping open” the trunk of an automobile without a warrant or probable cause.
Craig's actions display “a serious pattern of continued disregard for the laws of the United States,” complained McNelis in a May 12 letter to Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynn Lamprecht. Protesting that Craig “attacked me, my family, and my home” by lying to a judge to obtain a search warrant, McNelis told the federal prosecutor that he fears “for the safety of my family, myself, and all Idaho citizens [who] are subjected to this man's unchecked, illegal means and methods as a police officer.”
Apart from the likelihood that Craig -- an impenitent perjurer and serial violator of the Fourth Amendment -- could abuse the rights of other innocent citizens, his well-documented hostility to the truth could easily compromise investigations involving crimes of violence, McNelis warned Lamprecht: “Will the mandatory release of `Brady material' on Stephen Craig provide the loophole that allows a murderer, child molester, or rapist to walk free?”
In his letter to Lamprecht, McNelis also referred to a May 11 conversation in which he asked the assistant U.S. attorney to investigate Craig -- and described the stone wall of stolid indifference upon which that request shattered.
“After speaking to you personally … I was contacted by an FBI agent two hours later who did not provide his last name or badge number and only identified himself as `Kyle,'” McNelis recalled. “Kyle informed me that due to your unsupported decision to not pursue any form of criminal charges against Stephen Craig he would be unable to initiate any investigation whatsoever into this matters.”
|Preening racketeer Gary Raney, now enjoying a federal sinecure.|
Predictably, nobody has been held accountable for what was done to McNelis and his family. Like Craig, Officer Del Rio remains in law enforcement as an officer with the Boise Police Department (where he is paid more than $61,000 a year). Sheriff Raney resigned earlier this year, roughly half-way through his third elected term, to take a new position with the Justice Department that is essentially a well-compensated sinecure. Raney, who had been one of the highest-paid government officials in Idaho, arranged for his resignation to take effect the day that he became eligible to collect his $64,000 annual pension. (Idaho's average annual household income in 2014 was a little less than $48,000.)
Ada County spent more than a half-million dollars in their futile effort to defeat McNelis's pro se civil rights lawsuit. This included dispatching deputies to Florida in an effort to interview his hostile ex-wife, and retainers for “expert witnesses” – including Les Kjemhus, a drug war profiteer and former RCMP official who now operates a lucrative drug war consulting business.
|Take off, eh! Former RCMP pot "expert" Kjemhus.|
Without the benefit of legal training or tax subsidies, McNelis spent a considerable amount seeking redress for “irreparable damages” to family relationships (beginning with losing custody of his daughter), his business, and his personal reputation.
Untutored in law but armed with an agile mind and an invincible determination to pursue justice, McNelis stood alone against the Ada County government – represented in court by a panel of five well-paid government attorneys – and won.
The jury that ruled in McNelis's favor – acknowledging the injuries that had been inflicted on him and his family through the dishonesty of Deputy Craig and the agency that employed him – awarded the victim damages in the amount of a single dollar.
Obviously, the jury that heard the case couldn't ignore the facts, but it also couldn't conceal its contempt for a man who impudently refused to submit to his overseers. That doesn't diminish in any way the magnitude of McNelis's victory over the corrupt agency that laid siege to his family: They took his daughter, so he kicked their ass.
If you can, please contribute to help keep Pro Libertate online. Thank you, and God bless!
Dum spiro, pugno!
the reason things are as they unfolded in this case is demonstrated by the jury outcome: they couldn't ignore the facts, but, regardless, sided with the cops by the award.
the salient point is the jury SIDED with the cops by their award and that is why the abuse continues - too many let them get away with it.
1 dollar?! That's hardly "kicked their ass."
A civil award would have been paid by the tax victims residing within Ada County, not by the offenders -- who had no skin in the game, as it were.
Ada County spent a huge sum and deployed a platoon of attorneys in an attempt to defeat McNelis in court. He took them on and beat them soundly. Irrespective of the size of the award, that outcome is a straight-up win by any honest reckoning.
Looks like the Judge was the only one who gave a shit, besides McNelis.
When injustice in the courts prevail, it is only a matter of time before people will seek recourse in the form of "street justice". Look at what happened to the police in Romania after the fall of the Communist government....
In a just society this criminal cop should be facing the death penalty for these especially egregious crimes.
Many times when juries award too much the case goes back to court over that amount. This should be too easy for any lawyer to step in and help this guy out to get a just award.
Your tax dollars could not bury the lies but the government lawyers did get the jury to disrespect the victim as a person. Likely with having the jury believing he had it coming anyway, regardless that the cops lied. If so, that had nothing to do with the case and is a complete scam, that he is personally a bad guy whom deserved whatever came his way. By allowing that kind of defence by the defendants at the trial, the judge went along with fraud upon the court. He's still a crime victim yet again by having suffered more crimes against him by the state. The jury agreed that he was a crime victim, but the jury was toyed with to a point that they disrespected him with contempt. The trial was a fraud.
So people CLOSE to you believe you're a drug dealer because...? I don't get it. I'm pretty sure they never take away parent visitation rights no matter what you do. He never exercised them or what?
The people closest to Mr. McNelis -- his daughter and his wife -- believed he was innocent. As explained above, his daughter was abducted by authorities after the charges were filed and McNelis was threatened with a felony prosecution if he defended his parental rights during the emergency shelter hearing. Even if he had been a drug dealer -- something the Ada County Sheriff and Prosecutor failed entirely to prove -- the treatment inflicted on McNelis and his family would have to be regarded as abominable.
As someone who has never used drugs and does not intend to do so in the future, I would far rather take my chances with narco-entrepreneurs than with armed enforcers of prohibition.
Post a Comment