Thursday, November 18, 2010

Practicing Airport Security Without A License

Dude looks like a lady: Kristina Ross is a MAN, baby!

My first question is this: How on earth did this person dream up the pseudonym "Berlyn Aussieahshowna"?
My second question is: Why isn't this person employed by the TSA?

A few weeks ago police were contacted by the staff of a local cosmetic surgeon who complained that they had received numerous phone calls asking for a "Dr. Berlyn Aussieahshowna." 

The memorably named specialist had supposedly offered to perform various cosmetic enhancements on women whose breasts she had examined during conversations in local nightclubs. 

It turns out that "Dr. Aussieahshowna" is actually an individual named Kristina B. Ross, who is not a doctor of any kind. The story is complicated even further by the fact that Ross is actually a man, albeit one who "identifies" as a woman. Following a 2003 conviction for aggravated battery, Ross served four years in a men's prison, although he (assuming that the pronoun fits) was not housed in the general population. 

As Judge Kevin Swain observes, Ross -- who is not a physician -- was "a male touching women's breasts under the guise of being a female doctor." On at least one occasion, Ross allegedly persuaded a victim to disrobe in order for him to "examine" her, supposedly to evaluate her suitability for cosmetic surgery. Others were reportedly felt up through their clothing. All of this was done on a pretext by someone seeking to gratify prurient interests, albeit of a convoluted variety.

Ross is accused of practicing medicine without a license, which is a felony. However, if authorities are at all interested in applying the law equitably, the police should conduct wholesale arrests at Boise Airport, where scores of TSA employees are physically molesting innocent people, while forcing others to be virtually disrobed by way of backscatter scanning devices.   

None of these federal employees is a licensed physician. All of them are committing sexual battery of some variety. It's reasonable to believe -- especially in light of the grimy institutional history of the agency that employs them -- that the desire to satisfy prurient interests explains the presence of least some of the people palpating the intimate anatomy of strangers.

Either the Boise Police should be dispatched to arrest every member of the local TSA molester squad, or the charges against Ross should be reduced to "practicing airport security without a license." 

The widespread and growing revulsion over the practice of airport molestation is an encouraging development, if only because it illustrates that the public retains at least some semblance of a moral gag reflex. It hasn't taken long for the War Party and its minions to co-opt this sentiment, however. Now we're being told that we should blame the besetting threat posed by distant, fuzzy-faced Mohammedans for the ritual humiliation suffered by Americans every time they attempt to board an airplane

How in heaven's name can this be right?

The GOP-dominated element of the Tea Party was produced through the political equivalent of genetic engineering. It is a recombinant political organism that blends facile populist hostility toward "Big Government" with unqualified support for militarism -- which is Big Government denuded of any humanitarian pretense.   

From the highest minarets of Fox News to the retail-level muezzins in Republican-aligned talk radio, the War Party is singing the praises of ethnic/religious profiling as a substitute for subjecting everyone to ritualized humiliation at airport checkpoints. 

This assumes, of course, that the TSA is interested in enhancing the security of air passengers. It isn't. The objective of the policy is to make Mundanes submit to their supposed betters, not to protect them from terrorism. 

As former Customs inspector-turned-whistleblower Diane Klienman pointed out in a June 2007 interview with Pro Libertate, the most serious airport security breach in recent history was actually facilitated by the same Homeland Security apparatus that supposedly protects us. 

Russell DeFreitas, a former “baggage handler” at JFK who was accused of involvement in a plot to blow up that airport, was previously employed as a baggage handler and/or a “trainee supervisor” in the employ of Evergreen International Airlines, a CIA front company based in McMinnville, Oregon.

Evergreen is a direct descendant of the infamous Air America, a CIA proprietary airline that was deeply involved in narcotics smuggling, arms trafficking, and other charming enterprises. One  former Evergreen pilot has testified under oath that the CIA used the airline to supply both sides in various Cold War-era regional conflicts. More recently, Evergreen played a central role in the CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program, supplying planes used as  “torture taxis” to convey detainees to various CIA-operated dungeons around the world.

DeFreitas left Evergreen's employ in May 2001, and details are sketchy regarding his job history from that point until his June 2007 arrest. He was employed at JFK in the 1990s, and Klieman told me that DeFreitas's background with Evergreen means "only one thing -- he was working at JFK doing drug smuggling.”

Diane Klieman testifying before a legislative committee.
The CIA has always been involved in drug smuggling, and Evergreen or Air America has played a big role in it,” Klieman elaborated. “When I was working Customs at JFK, we had this huge problem with airline personnel using their secure keys to give unauthorized access to `sterile corridors' that bypassed Customs inspection. Quite often this involved drug smuggling, and I've got ample reason to believe that Evergreen and other CIA assets were involved in it.”

To her disgust and horror, Klieman discovered that the federalized security system at JFK was incurably corrupt and thoroughly politicized. While passengers had to suffer manifold indignities in order to board an airliner, the planes themselves were entirely accessible to criminals and potential terrorists -- both those on the CIA's payroll and those who might be rogue elements. Among the unsettling discoveries she made was that it was possible for unidentified personnel to drive unmarked vehicles right up to the loading ramps at JFK without attracting the interest of security personnel.

When Klieman complained about this state of affairs, she received the standard whistle-blower treatment: She was abused by her supervisors (one of whom referred to her as a "Jew bitch") and fired without cause.

Any terrorist worth worrying about wouldn't try to smuggle explosives onto an airplane on his or her person; instead, the terrorist in question would be part of a cell that had infiltrated the security team at a targeted airport, thereby gaining direct access to the airplanes themselves. And as Diane Klieman can testify from first-hand experience, terrorists of that description would be getting inside help (for reasons of personal corruption or political opportunism) from people inside the federal system that supposedly protects us

What this means, of course, is that the entire rationale behind the TSA's cop-a-feel security protocol is as phony as "Beryln Aussieahshowna"'s medical credentials. 

It should be remembered that we live under a Regime in which the president supposedly has the authority to order the sexual torture of children, and whose interrogators can use the threat of prison rape to extract a confession from a child soldier for use in a Stalinist show trial. Why, then, should be be surprised that the same Regime would institutionalize the public sexual humiliation of its subjects?

Your donations help keep Pro Libertate on-line. Thanks, and God bless!






Dum spiro, pugno!


24 comments:

the riddles are abound tonight said...

Are they trying to wipe out the airline industry so they can take that over too? Are they hoping some hot head will go off after getting groped and fondled by an only following orders double digit IQ mouth breather so they can crack down on what dwindling freedoms we have left? Will all the perverts, molesters, she males, freaks, trannies, weirdos, creeps, douchebags flock to the TSA job application kiosk or web page?

Lemuel Gulliver said...

"Are they trying to wipe out the airline industry?"

No, they are hoping for generous campaign kickbacks form the manufacturer of the billions of dollars' worth of these machines that WILL be installed in every airport. The deal has been signed in the back room, and we need to face the fact that these machines are here to stay. Like it or not. Enjoy! We hope you also enjoy the feel of a fiber-optic probe up your rectum, with your hemmorhoids on camera for all to see. That comes next, once you get used to being groped and fondled. And you remember the video of Saddam having his tonsils examined with a wooden spatula? That's YOU baby, in about two years' time.

You think I'm kidding, don't you?

"Are they hoping some hot head will go off after getting groped and fondled?"

Yes, nothing would please them more. Then the next person who complains can be shot dead because the TSA mouth-breather "feared for his safety." (So much for Airline Passenger Safety.) THAT will shut the "Opt-Outers" up for good.

"Will all the perverts, molesters, she-males, freaks, trannies, weirdos, creeps, douchebags flock to the TSA job application kiosk?"

What makes you think they haven't already done so?

- Lemuel Gulliver.

liberranter said...

No, they are hoping for generous campaign kickbacks form the manufacturer of the billions of dollars' worth of these machines that WILL be installed in every airport. The deal has been signed in the back room, and we need to face the fact that these machines are here to stay.

The chink in their armor, so far, is that most of these porno-ray machines are placed within very easy reach of passengers who have not yet been screened. What is to stop an angry passenger from carrying a large hammer or some other blunt object (or even an actual weapon) up to the checkpoint and start swinging away at any piece of invasive technology within reach? Or, better yet, SEVERAL passengers wielding similar objects at the same time? Many of US vs. Few of THEM = no contest.

Yes, nothing would please them more. Then the next person who complains can be shot dead because the TSA mouth-breather "feared for his safety." (So much for Airline Passenger Safety.) THAT will shut the "Opt-Outers" up for good.

Again, I ask the a variation of my previous question: What exactly about the current layout of airport terminals prevents passengers from carrying firearms or other blunt-objects-come-weapons up to the security checkpoints in order to "respond in kind" to the scenario described here? (You'll probably also note that this is a variation of the already oft-asked question that the fear mongers refuse to even acknowledge, let alone answer, namely: why would a "terrorist" need to get anywhere near an plane to wreak death and destruction when he has all the soft targets he could ever ask for inside the airport terminal area?) The answer is nothing, at least in every airport through which I've ever traveled. There would be NOTHING to prevent someone from standing to one side of the cattleherd line to lay in wait for one of these thugtards to make the proverbial "straw that breaks the camel's back" move that would prompt a tit-for-tat exchange, one that would not end well for at least some of the uniformed pervs.

Now of course the equation I just described would change completely if the fedthugs decided to extend their "security" [sic] perimeter beyond the airport terminal boarding areas to the check-in areas, or even out to the airport entrances off of the main highways. However, I see this as unlikely, at least in the foreseeable future, due to both the human and vehicular traffic backups that this would cause, for I can think of NO airport sufficiently removed from a major transportation artery that this could be avoided. Such a thing would unavoidably inconvenience even the zookeepers themselves, which would defeat the purpose.

Facecrime in the Disneyland Gulag said...

Did you know Skeletor Chertoff and lil' Georgie Soros own stock in the company making the body scanners? Still the best demockracy money can buy.

Anonymous said...

Russia Today points out an important detail being left out of most mainstream media reports about the new body scanning devices being rolled out in airports everywhere: former Department of Homeland Security Chief, Michael Chertoff, who has been advocating this technology on any news program that will have him is personally profiting from their implementation. As a Security Consultant and Chairman of the Chertoff Group, one of his main clients is Rapiscan, a manufacturer of these devices.

Last year, the Department of Homeland Security awarded contracts of US$160 million each to two manufacturers of these back-scattering devices, one which which was Rapiscan.

Luke Fisher said...

I've been seeing and hearing the calls for more ethnic / religious profiling as the cure-all for this hysteria, especially among the neoconservative talking heads, as Mr. Grigg has already pointed out. Many of them are pointing to how the fascist Israeli State profiles and they have legendary security, as they say.

What is your position on that? Leaving aside the obvious solution of ending the imperialism, the warfare, the killings.

Lemuel Gulliver said...

Liberranter,

You are right. The same thing has occurred to me. The last time I flew out of Dulles Airport outside DC, a couple of years ago on a Friday afternoon, there were about 1,000 people - I swear not an exaggeration - waiting in line for security. The wait was about 30 minutes. The line went up the length of the concourse, then back, then up, then back, then up again.

I thought to myself, what is to prevent someone wheeling a suitcase with 50 lbs of C-4 right in the door, past the check-ins, right into the middle of this mass of 1,000 people, and setting it off? The death toll would be at least a couple of hundred, maybe several hundred, and the injuries would be horrific. There are several airports like it, where the TSA has people huddled in great masses, hundreds of them, waiting to go through the cattle dip. Sitting ducks.

But no, this kind of thing never occurs to these mouth-breathing cretins, whose belt size is bigger than their IQ.

RE. the "Legendary" Israeli security mentioned above: A few years ago some crazy Turk at LAX walked up to the check-in line at ElAl and opened fire, only to be instantly shot dead by undercover Israeli agents in the crowd. I thought to myself then, brother, if he had had a suitcase of Semtex, walked to the check-in line and set it off without announcing himself, he would have killed at least 50 people. But he wasn't a terrorist, just a crazy guy with no access to that kind of material.

We are SO lucky that the terrorists (if they really even exist,) are as dumb and lacking in imagination as the TSA.

- Lemuel Gulliver.

PS: Actually, an Israeli told me how they do their security. A friendly security person will ask pleasantly, "So where are you going in Israel? Have you ever been before? What did you like on that visit? Do you have friends there? Are you going to stay with them? Did you stay with them last time? What's their address? Oh yes, did you ever go out for coffee at the Starbucks at the end of that street? What was their name again? Oh yes, that apartment number must be on the second floor, right? What was the number again? Those are nice shoes. They look new? Did you buy them here in New York? What brand are they? I'd like to buy a pair of those myself. What store did you buy them in? Is that here in New York? What street is it on? Oh, Seventh Avenue. I'm new here. Is that avenue east of Fifth Avenue, or west? How do you spell the name of the store again?"

And so on, and so on. If you are legitimate, your answers will be right. If not, you will slip up, or not know something you should know, or contradict yourself, and they will continue the conversation until the time comes for them to take you aside, by which time there will be about four of them watching your every move, since the interview has gone on longer than it should. See how intelligent security works?

- LG.

Anonymous said...

As folks here, and not surprisingly on various other sites, have mentioned is what is there to stop someone from leaving a bag full of explosives at the ticket counter or at the "security" line if in fact killing large numbers of people is what they intend? Eh? Why not blow up a football stadium during game day or a bridge during rush hour or countless other horrors? I know of numerous ways to bring this nations infrastructure to its knees with minimal cost and all from sitting at this keyboard. The operative words here are "want to" and not just ability to. If someone wants to cause chaos, and true terror, they can. It isn't difficult at all so it simply boils down to their will to carry out the act. I have to laugh at what Gulliver says about Israeli security because what they're doing is what the best interrogator in the world, a German in WW2, did without ever feeling up a little girl or groping grandma.

Anonymous said...

I couldn't resist commenting on this.

"From the highest minarets of Fox News to the retail-level muezzins in Republican-aligned talk radio"

Oh how true! I had to laugh because that's such a good line. The call for profiling, which I think is far better even though I hate the entire TSA, is only part of the poison pill offer that the Feds will give the public after these latest outrages. That's how it all works. Two steps back with your liberties, one forward, and then two steps back again. Sort of a dance in reverse to some rail car of submissive obedience shuttling you to where?

liberranter said...

Why not blow up a football stadium during game day or a bridge during rush hour or countless other horrors? I know of numerous ways to bring this nations infrastructure to its knees with minimal cost and all from sitting at this keyboard.

I think it's significant that the closest thing this country has experienced since 9/11/01 to a repeat of that day's events is the failed "kamikaze" attack by the hapless Joe Stack into an Austin, Texas IRS facility earlier this year. Note that his target was a U.S. government entity, NOT a commercial venue patronized willingly by innocent mundanes. In other words, Joe Stack, the closest thing to a "terrorist" (at least as defined by the Regime) that this country has seen in the last decade, targeted an agency of the Regime that was responsible for the bulk of his suffering.

Most amazing is that fact that not only has there to date been only ONE Joe Stack, not the hundreds, or even thousands that we would have expected as the Amerikanischer Sicherheitstaat grows and metastasizes, but that there has been no credible evidence of any incipient attacks by individuals or organizations originating from the far-flung corners of the Empire populated by Muslims under our oppressive boot heel. But they don't need to launch anymore acts of violence on our soil. Having terrified us into a panic nine years ago, they are doing the smart thing, which is letting us turn on ourselves in a destructive frenzy of totalitarian violence and orgiastic spending on military conquest that will soon bankrupt us, cause national collapse, and turn us into an anarcho-nihilistic jungle of a society.

In other words, the Regime damned well knows that the odds of any "terrorist" striking anywhere in the UFSA is absolutely NIL. The TSA are merely a shock-troop vanguard of the incipient martial law that will prevail once total collapse occurs.

Nullifier said...

I don't plan to fly until this madness is ended, but if I do and this sort of thing happens to me, I might be charged with practicing dentistry without a license.

CC Truckston said...

My question is: How many of the scanner pictures will end up on YouTube?

Jeff Bayer said...

Is it a dude that looks like a woman, or a woman that looks like a dude? Hmmm... this question is actually sort of arbitrary to the story, until you ask yourself what "she/he" was doing with women. How are we to really know then, exactly WHO and WHAT GENDER the folks at the good ol' TSA that are allowed to us the "enhanced" examinations? That's why we choose a doctor that we think we can trust. TSA are folks we've likely never seen before, doing things we only let our doctor do to us, because we KNOW the doctor and implicitly trust them. TRUST just ANY OLD government employee? I think NOT! This is WHY...

http://itsprettyneat.posterous.com/pro-libertate-practicing-airport-security-wit

9th Company said...

Why the hub bub. At least the ATF won't be the bottom feeder of Federal Law Enforcement.

id scanner said...

Nothing to do. These days we live where there is no other choice but to ensure the security of mankind. Even if sometimes it makes invasion of privacy

zach said...

Think of the billions wasted on this security theater. Even if people have this obsession with supposed muslim terrorists, neocons should know that my dad is a pilot for United and he's taken many pictures of the muslim women, fully veiled, going to clean the airplanes without any security process at all. Just a simple laminated badge which they show at the employee parking lot. It has nothing to do with security and everything to do with slave training. Your chances of being the victim of a terror attack, even if they got rid of all security at the airports would still be around 0.But now we can never get rid of the TSA. If we did, they'd stage a terror attack and the media would scold us: "See what happens when you fight back slaves?"

liberranter said...

But now we can never get rid of the TSA. If we did, they'd stage a terror attack and the media would scold us: "See what happens when you fight back slaves?"

Count on exactly such a false-flag operation happening in the VERY near future anyway, now that resistance to the fascist security theater has reached fever pitch. The only question that remains is, will the Amoricon sheeple be smart enough to see through the charade this time? After all, they've had nine long years to see the evidence in plain sight in front of their noses that the original event was a state-orchestrated scam.

Lemuel Gulliver said...

Liberranter & everyone,

This bullshit circus we are living in was justified by the false flag operation of the Underwear Bomber. Read the eyewitness account of THAT bullshit, written by a lawyer who has never been allowed to testify and whose story was TOTALLY ignored by the MSM, here:

http://www.opednews.com/populum/print_friendly.php?p=The-Underwear-Bomber-More-by-pete-johnson-100106-351.html

Now, if you want to know the REASON for that operation and the REASON the taxpayers are spending billions to install these porno-scanners, go here:

http://www.opednews.com/populum/print_friendly.php?p=Terror-TSA-and-Our-Rights-by-Andrew-Kreig-101119-451.html

Quote from that story:

"The government's ramped-up searches this fall make no sense except as a Big Brother project. Abusive searches waste vast amounts of money and time to enable insiders to funnel tax dollars to such fear-mongers as former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, above, whose security company advises Rapiscan, one of the two manufacturers of the scanners."

SEE?? It is all so Michael Chertoff, (Juan, where are you??? Chertoff is a JEW!!!) can make a million bucks or so in consulting fees, for staging the Underwear Bomber false flag operation and getting Congress to fund these scanners to the tune of billions of taxpayer dollars paid to his corporate clients. SEE how our system works??

This land is NOT my land, or your land, or our land. It is the corporations' land. Our money, our freedoms, our privacy, our bodies, everything we own, THEY WANT IT. And they are going to take it, by armed force if necessary. Resist and you die.

And I thought we abolished slavery in America?

If you want to know what is really going on in your country, read THIS one, entitled "The Billionaires want More, More, More" ---

http://www.opednews.com/populum/print_friendly.php?p=The-Billionaires-Want-More-by-Bernie-Sanders-101119-265.html

Have fun.
- Lemuel Gulliver.

Anonymous said...

Now el-Pistole says we can expect Trains, subways and buses to get extra attention! Oh, yeah. It keeps getting better. And with mobile back-scatter vans prowling your neighborhoods they're now going to bring cancer to your doorstep.

liberranter said...

Now el-Pistole says we can expect Trains, subways and buses to get extra attention! Oh, yeah. It keeps getting better. And with mobile back-scatter vans prowling your neighborhoods they're now going to bring cancer to your doorstep.

I predict that a whole lot of these machines, if deployed in public away from the controlled confines of airports, are gonna wind up full of "stray" bullet holes ("OOPS! Damn, Billy, y'know I was aimin' fer the billboard in the pasture. Slow down next time!") or will become the unfortunate casualties of "accidents" in which motorists "accidentally" run off the road and into locations where they've been "stealthily" set up (like the speed traps in which unmarked cars that might as well be labeled in flourescent paint with "I'm a Cop on Revenue Collection Duty" are stealthily deployed). Wouldn't it be unfortunate if some of the coperators tending to these machines took a hit along with the equipment they were operating? What a tragic shame. Hazards of the trade, I guess...

Anonymous said...

Liberanter, you already know they'll make them "martyrs" for security along with all the other heroes in black.

Anonymous said...

See how intelligent security works?

Intelligent security is impossible in the US due to the demands of the "affirmative action" regime-and probably for other reasons as well.

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul has introduced the traveler dignity act recently. This will be a great bell weather test to see whether or not any of these tea party politicians actually support something with substance.

I read a transcipt of what he said. All of it was good, but especially parts like (these are off the top of my head, btw.)

"My bill is simple. It just says that TSA employees are accountable to the laws they break, including and especially sexual assault."

"I presume that most of you believe that citizens should never give up their rights."

"maybe if we were to subject members of congress, and the president to this, it would go away, likely rather quickly."

I'd love to see someone, anyone back the bill. I'm sure it will be completely buried by both blue and red mouthbreathers.

We're getting awful close to the point where people start bringing violence to the doorstep of "law enforcement". ( i have to laugh when I use that phrase...)

9th Company said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIan6woglrA

All good humour has an element of truth..